 

|
ROAD
SAFETY NEWS - WEEK COMMENCING 8 MARCH 2004
|
Parental
fears hamper walking and riding to school
Nearly two thirds of parents are so worried about abduction that
they are not teaching their children basic road safety, according
to research released last week.
The study found that over 60 per cent of parents who drive to
school would allow their child to walk or cycle if they knew they
would be protected from strangers. The more common dangers of
being hit by a car or knocked off a bicycle are less of a priority.
According to the research, conducted as part of Ready Brek's road
safety education in primary schools, parents are also worried
about the condition of their roads, with 77 per cent considering
the roads in their local area to be unsafe for children.
"The research provides valuable feedback from those we are
trying to protect," said Liz Barkwith, speaking
on behalf of LARSOA. "Parents must realise that the most
effective way to raise their child's road safety awareness is
to teach them by example. Children are not able to judge distance
and speed of traffic so it is even more important that they are
taught basic rules to follow.
The survey found that 41 per cent of parents who drove to and
from school actually lived less than a mile away. "Children
travelling regularly by car don't get the road experience or develop
the awareness that those who walk or cycle do," Liz Barkwith
added. "Parents who live so close to the school need to make
a committed effort to teach their child road skills by not driving.
They would also help reduce congestion."
More @ www.readybrek.co.uk/roadsafety
|
Camera
site casualty figures to be published
The crash history of every speed camera is to be made public, according
to a report that appeared in The Times recently. The report said
that police and local authorities will publish the number of casualties
at every site before and after a camera was installed, allowing
drivers to assess their impact on safety.
"We have been asking for this information to be placed in the
public domain to demonstrate that cameras are about casualty reduction,"
said Ian Bell, speed camera liaison officer for the
Association of Chief Police Officers. "Hopefully it will raise
public confidence in cameras and win over those who suspect cameras
are about making money."
Mr Bell added that several of Britains 42 police and local
authority camera partnerships already published the number of casualties
at each site before a camera was installed. But they do not reveal
what is happening to the rate since the camera began flashing.
"The before and after data would be published on the websites
of each partnership," he explained. "It would also be
a good idea to include it on penalty notices so drivers could see
why the camera which caught them had been installed."
More @ http://www.pacts.org.uk/news/newsframe.htm |
Authorities
defend road safety record
Local authorities have defended their road safety performance in
the wake of statistics revealing the fatal and serious injuries
have risen by more than a third in some areas - though widespread
reductions have been achieved in many areas (Surveyor, 26 February).
The DfT has published a regional and local authority breakdown of
KSIs. The figures for 2002 are shown alongside the 1994-98 baseline
to indicate progress towards meeting the Governments 10-year
plan target of a 40 per cent cut in KSIs by 2010.
The vast majority of counties and unitaries show sizeable reductions,
with 14 already exceeding the 40 per cent target and another 39
achieving reductions of 20 per cent or more.
Casualties had increased in 17 areas and in Bristol and Bournemouth
KSIs were 37 per cent up on the baseline average. A Bristol spokeswoman
said the council was very concerned about the 2002 increase
which contrasted with a falling trend in KSIs since the 1990s. Road
safety officers believe the figures may have been influenced by
a change made to accident report forms in 2002 to include descriptions
of serious injuries to help the police with severity coding. |
DfT
encourages more flexibility over 30mph zones
Highway authorities have been given more flexibility to introduce
30mph limits in villages, in long awaited guidance from the DfT
(Surveyor 26 February 2004).
The traffic advisory leaflet circular 1/04 encourages the majority
of councils to consider 30mph limits in any settlement with 20 or
more houses or fewer if there is a church or shop. The document
forms part of the DfTs pledge to make 30mph village limits
the norm.
Villages just 400 meters long should be considered for 30mph limits,
the Department advises - but it would prefer 600m where possible
to avoid too many changes of speed limit.
The 1993 guidance that development should be continuous built
up with development in depth on both sides of the road
has been scrapped. Instead, settlements only need a minimum density
of three homes per 100 meters. |
Australia
to trial point-to-point speed cameras
The Australian State of New South Wales has announced it will trial
point-to-point speed cameras targetting long-distance speeders.
The cameras will operate on a 12km and a 34km stretch of the Pacific
Highway, and a 4km length of the M4 motorway.
For further details go to http://www.pacts.org.uk/news/newsframe.htm
and follow the link. |
Bikers
and cyclists clash over bus lane experiment
Groups representing cyclists and powered two-wheelers clashed as
an investigation opened into the experimental use of London bus
lanes by motorcyclists (Surveyor, 26 February).
The two sides made conflicting claims about TfLs trial on
three major routes into the capital.
Since October 2002, motorbikes have been permitted to use bus lanes
on the A41 Finchley Road, A23 Brixton Road, and A13 East India Dock
Road during bus priority hours. TfLs head of project development,
David Wroe, told the committee it had decided to
extend the trial owing to insufficient casualty data.
Motorcycling groups said this showed there was no increase in risk
to cyclists and pedestrians but cycling campaigners countered that
cyclists were being intimidated as well as put at risk - and that
this would deter more people from cycling.
The London Cycling Campaign said that the trial sent the wrong signal
to road users by encouraging the widespread illegal use of bus lanes
also arguing that the higher speeds reached by motorbikes
able to use bus lanes inevitably increased the risk and severity
of injury. |
Video
conferencing an alternative to driving to meetings
Television personality Noel Edmonds is to use his
video conferencing experience in the battle to reduce the number
of accidents involving company car and van drivers.
Mr Edmonds has launched a new video conferencing venture, face2face,
a nationwide network of over 300 video meeting rooms. He will use
the technology to address RoSPAs seminar on managing occupational
road risk at the Watford Hilton, Hertfordshire, on April 21, from
his Devon home.
The aim is to show delegates how thousands of miles of driving could
be avoided by using video to enable people at work to link up for
meetings around the country thereby reducing risks, costs
and stress.
"The idea is to promote the concept of meeting without
moving," Roger Bibbings, RoSPA occupational
safety adviser said. "By broadcasting live to our seminar Noel
will show how video-conferencing can help organisations eliminate
exposure to risk through unnecessary travel by road. RoSPA has said
for a long time that many road journeys could be avoided by using
video conferencing or alternative safer means of transport."
More information can be found at www.rospa.com/morr
or by ringing 0121 248 2120. |
Camera
partnership looks into SID signs
The London Safety Camera Partnership is considering the use of Speed
Indicative Devices (SIDs) that flash a warning sign to speeding
drivers, but has denied press reports that SIDs could replace many
safety cameras installed on the capitals road network (Local
Transport Today, 26 February).
"The partnership denies any intention to either reduce the
number of operational cameras fixed or mobile in London,
or [that it] has plans to replace any existing cameras with Speed
Indicator Devices," a spokeswoman said. She confirmed, however,
that the partnership had submitted a proposal to the DfT to assess
the effectiveness of SIDs. |
Advertising
complaint upheld
A complaint made by the Dorset Cyclists' Network
and members of the public about a press advertisement for Halfords
that was headlined Beat the ban for less, has been upheld
by the ASA.
The advertisement, for a hands free car phone system, showed an
image of a woman apparently dialling numbers on a hands-free mobile
phone while driving with only one hand on the wheel.
The advertisement also showed an image of two speed camera detectors,
with text next to the image stating Don't be caught speeding!
We support speed limits and safe driving - that's why you need detectors.
The complainants argued that the camera detector claim was irresponsible
because it encouraged people to drive above the speed limit and
break the law, and that the image of the woman was also irresponsible
and likely to encourage dangerous practice.
With regard to the speed camera detector the ASA advised the advertisers
to amend the advertisement.
With regard to the mobile phone, the ASA considered that because
the woman could be seen to be driving with one hand only on the
steering wheel and because motorists could be prosecuted for failing
to have proper control when using a hands-free phone, the image
of the woman was irresponsible and was likely to be seen to encourage
dangerous practice. |
|
| |
| |
|